Love Canal Essay -- History Love Canal Research Papers

manage CanalWhen one thinks about an environmental misadventure, the image of a coarse explosion in a highly industrial area comes to mind. such is not the case in the applaud Canal emergency. Un alike around environmental disasters, the events of Niagara F everyss Love Canal werent characterized by a known and mutinous moment of impact. It developed over a period of several decades, since the effectuate of leaching chemicals is uncertain and slow in development and the visual effectuate are very limited. This disaster could have been identified earlier or later for as far as the rest of the world was concern there was no emergency until the authorities made it public. The importance of Love Canal is that acknowledging the danger that existed made the country and world aware of the hazards of broken-down toxic waste disposal sites. The events that led up to President value Carter and the New York Department of Health declaring Love Canal the nations first national emerge ncy for a nonnatural environmental disaster extend all the way back to the 1890s when the entrepreneur William T. Love wanted to course a canal to supply power to a utopian industrial community called Model City (Deegan 329). However, Loves dreams were crushed with the discovery of alternating galvanising current which enabled manufacturing plants to be located further away from their sources of energy. Yet, Niagara Falls clam up became a center of chemical manufacturing due to the large amount of insolent electrical energy available. One of the chemical companies that was attracted to the area was Hooker electrochemical Company (now a division of Occidental Petroleum Corporation), who in 1942, with the permission of the Niagara Power and Development Company began using the a... ...the safety risk is worth assuming and that is something that each individual has to decide for themselves. In the meantime, it is up to companies, like Occidental/Hooker and the government, like th e EPA or Department of Health to aver safe production limits and methods of disposal, so that another such environmental disaster wont take place in the future. Works CitedDeegan, John. Looking Back at Love Canal. environmental perception and Technology 21 (1987) 328-331.Hoffman, Andrew. An Uneasy renascence at Love Canal. Environment 37 (1995) 5-9. Levine, Adeline. Love Canal Science Politics, and People. Massachusetts Lexington Books, 1982. Phibbs, Pat. N.Y. state begins 5-year Love Canal health study that includes noncancer effects. Environmental Science and Technology 31 (1997) 81A. http//web.globalserve.net/spinc/atomcc/lovecana.htm