Henry James Washington Square :: Henry JamesWashington Square

atomic number 1 JamesWashington SquareHenry James Washington Square is much than a unanalyzable novel with simple characters connected by a simple plot. There are more complex issues brought forth within the text besides a female child heartbroken over her fathers control and the departure of her money grubbing suitor. Yet totally the simplistic issues and characterizations are brought forth in the critical article create verbally by Elizabeth Hardwick.Within the pages of On Washington Square, published in slope 3230, Hardwick offers her readers the entire plot, including the ending of James novel, with pop shedding new light on the text. She offers lowly interpretation of the material and only provides readers with the obvious.Hardwick explains the novel in such particular one could almost use it as a Cliff Notes edition to the book. She uses what is said about Townsend to demonstrate that he wants nothing more than Catherines money, til now she does not look close enoug h to realize that he is more complex than the information that the bank clerk provides (On Washington Square 26).The biggest injury in On Washington Square is that Hardwick does not recognize that the narrator of Washington Square provides the reader with only the information he wants to, expiration out details that could slant the story. There are several measure in the novel when the narrator waffles on his accuracy using phrases like, It aptitude very well be in regards to describing Catherines emotions (James 36). The narrator also leaves out information, which the reader assumes is unimportant, but cannot be sure, for the narrator has already shone that he does not guarantee to know the emotions of the characters, let alone the importance of their actions. For example, during a dialogue between Morris and Catherine the narrator cuts off the conversation and states, This is all that need be recorded of their conversation (66). These statements and several like them show th e narrator to be unreliable, yet Hardwick explains the novel through the narrators eyes, portraying the information as accurate.