Manifest Destiny Essay Example for Free

clear Destiny EssayThe opinion in Manifest Destiny, Americas right to expand westward, was popular among the Democratic Party, which paved the path for conflict in U.S. politics. In the 1840s, Manifest Destiny was used as justification for the annexation of Texas, the war with Mexico, and to acquire portions of operating theatre from the British.The debate over whether America really had a discernible destiny to expand all the dash west or if it was used as an excuse to acquire more land led to debates in U. S. politics. Advocates of manifest destiny, loosely democratic, vied that the U.S., as a more advanced culture, had a God-given right to expand its borders. They believed the magnification would civilize the West and Americas democratic, cultural, and religious values would benefit the Native Americans. In addition, supporters would argue that the belief would strengthen the union, making it invulnerable. On the opposing side, consisting mostly of the Whig party, the God-given right to expand all the management westward at the price and rights of thousands of innocent natives was blasphemy. The Whig party was not manifest destinies only critic, abolitionist, fearful of thraldom spreading, argued that the constitution did not give the country the right to gain new land and the countrys vital institutions would suffer as America was spread too thin.Look moreessays on manifest destinyTexas sought to join America as a new state, after it gained independence from Mexico and had a revolution. The process of expansion in which newly democratic and free states would seek entry into the join States, preferably than the U.S. extending its government over unwanting people was ideal. The Democratic Party was threatened to fall apart if Texas entered the Union, as it would compose another slave state and this forced some(prenominal) Presidents Jackson and Van Buren to decline Texas plea.During the election of 1844, both Henry Clay of the Whig Party and Van Buren of the Democratic Party were against the annexation of Texas, this displeased the Democrats as they cherished to gain Texas so they dropped Van Buren in favor of James Polk, who was for adding Texas as another slave state. Polk smartly tied Texas annexation into the surgery dispute, the controversy over Oregons border. In 1846 the dispute was colonised over the Oregon Treaty where the British relinquished its holding to the lower Colombia basin. This appeased expansionist in the north, who fought for Oregon and expansionist in the south, who focused primarily on Texas.After Polks election, he moved to sop up a free portion of Texas that was still claimed by Mexico. This sparked the Mexican-American War in 1846, were there were calls for All Mexico, mostly from Eastern Democrats, however Mexicos annexation brought up much debate. If Mexico were to become a part of the United States it would mean millions of non-white Mexicans would become U.S. citizens, something Amer icans were not too keen on. The racist aspect of Manifest Destiny considers wanting(p) Mexicans unqualified to become Americans whereas the mission aspect of Manifest Destiny dictates that Mexicans would become improved under American democracy. The All Mexico movement quickly abated with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848 which granted Alta California and Nuevo Mxico to the United States, both of which were sparsely populated with Mexicans.After the Mexican-American War ended in 1848, disagreements over the expansion of slavery make further annexation by conquest too divisive to be official government policy. The belief in Manifest Destiny in the 1840s greatly influenced both U.S. politics and policy and is to rap or thank for Americas expansion from sea to shining sea.